Discussion about this post

User's avatar
MarkS's avatar

So, Ben, let me see if I've got this right.

In the UK, thousands of girls were raped and tortured. A tiny fraction of the perpetrators of these heinous crimes have been brought to any sort of justice.

But what you want us to be Very Concerned about is that one particular article in one particular publication might have assigned too much blame to one particular politician.

Do I have that right, Ben? Is that an accurate reflection of your moral calculus?

As a paying subscriber I'd really like to know.

Expand full comment
Kyle's avatar

All I’m seeing from this article is some very motivated reasoning from the author.

I’m no expert on any of this but Starmer seems to have been in a position to do something about this horrific scandal for years and did not until much later. Given that there have been thousands of victims over many decades, the 5 prosecutions he pursued don’t really add up to justice, in my view.

The ‘evidence’ you cite to prove Phillips’ innocence is just her statement on why she made that decision. That’s awfully credulous as well and again, I don’t know why I’m supposed to believe that.

For both Starmer and Phillips you use conservative governments having either made the same choices or having commended Starmer for his work to prove your point - as if this vindicates them or proves a blind spot in The FP report. The FP piece condemned the conservative governments as having been complicit as well for the exact thing it condemns Starmer and Phillips for. How does this prove anything?

This along with your very obvious hatred for Bari Weiss, The FP, Musk, and anyone else you deem as associated with them makes it hard to take your criticisms on their own merits or very seriously at all.

Expand full comment
409 more comments...

No posts