Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Susan's avatar

It seems like a lost opportunity to teach some history and add some context for young readers. Why not add a forward or afterward to discuss how Dahl and his views and their reflections in the text are (and are not) products of their time? How our thinking and expectations have evolved? Rather than papering over the words or rewriting them all together, why not educate people to understand why certain passages and phrases are objectionable while also acknowledging where and why they can be wonderful? I dread that we are reigniting the Dr. Seuss debates.

Expand full comment
Shannon Ahern's avatar

I also grew up loving Dahl's work, but it didn't make me a child abuser, bigot, or fat-phobe. (I myself am fat, and I never liked the removal of the Fat Ladies from Nilsson's The Point, either!). I read the Bobbsey Twins books and Mark Twain and Dickens, and I didn't grow up thinking child labour was great or that nannies in the current day would likely speak with the heavy accent of a Black nanny in the early 1900s. I am very concerned that rewriting history does a great disservice to children, but perhaps with the gutting of sophisticated intelligence and critical thinking in schools, those who have no faith in kids' ability to process such things have an actual argument. It's so depressing, really.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts