”Given the GOP’s main lines of defense have been completely destroyed by one of Trump’s own allies, they are struggling to come up with a plausible counter narrative.”
Why? Why switch from the counter narrative they’ve been using all along?
“Nothing to see here. The President did nothing wrong. Any witnesses against him aren’t credible. This is just a desperate Democrat [sic] attempt to make something out of nothing.”
When your defense is baseless, morally corrupt, and has nothing to do with the evidence... there’s little need to change it regardless of what new evidence comes to light.
”Given the GOP’s main lines of defense have been completely destroyed by one of Trump’s own allies, they are struggling to come up with a plausible counter narrative.”
Why? Why switch from the counter narrative they’ve been using all along?
“Nothing to see here. The President did nothing wrong. Any witnesses against him aren’t credible. This is just a desperate Democrat [sic] attempt to make something out of nothing.”
When your defense is baseless, morally corrupt, and has nothing to do with the evidence... there’s little need to change it regardless of what new evidence comes to light.