19 Comments
User's avatar
Lisa's avatar

10,000 points for using “shpadoinkle” in a sentence.

Expand full comment
Ikalvan2003's avatar

20,000 for sneaking in a Princess Bride reference.

Expand full comment
LJ57's avatar

We do not have the luxury of being “happy” as the Electoral College could still hand chump the country. We have to press hard in these remaining days. DO SOMETHING!

Expand full comment
Christopher Foxx's avatar

“The Federalist’s Sean Davis demanded that David Muir and Linsey Davis (no relation) should be brought up on criminal charges.”

Not that Republicans would ever engage in the “lawfare“ that they keep accusing liberals and Democrats of.

Say it with me: Every Republican accusation is a confession. Every single one. Every single time.

Expand full comment
Silent scorn's avatar

No means I’m not repeating your ridiculous and childish statement after you. Pull your head out. You’re on the wrong side of history.

Expand full comment
Christopher Foxx's avatar

Sean Davis is demanding the debate moderators be brought up on criminal charges because they corrected Trump on his lies, and you **don't** find that ridiculous?

When juries of regular citizens are presented with actual evidence and indict Republicans, the Republicans scream "lawfare" and "witch hunt" and then, presenting no evidence at all, declare their political opponents criminal who should be charged and even executed. And you don't see that as the Republicans of accusing their political opponents of *exactly* what the Republicans themselves are doing?

How do you manage that level of willful blindness?

Expand full comment
Silent scorn's avatar

Don’t know a Sean Davis. Debates don’t fall under any law that calls for punishment. Kamala is still a liar. 🤥

Expand full comment
Christopher Foxx's avatar

And is Trump, or is your concern directed only one way?

Expand full comment
Silent scorn's avatar

No.

Expand full comment
Jeff's avatar

Unless the moderators’ thumbs tip the scale for Trump, they’ll complain that their thumbs are on the scale for his opponent.

Kamala had the advantage of knowing what didn’t work against Trump in the past. Her strategy became simpler: do the opposite. We have seen him for nine years. She learned from his past, while others had not. 🤔😉😊

Expand full comment
Karen's avatar

Great assessment of both the debate, and the probable outcome! Let's keep this ball rolling forward, and get the orange blob out of our lives, our social media, and into lockup of some sort.....finally!

Expand full comment
Kels's avatar

I see the mainstream media is doing everything they can to even things back out -- balancing Trump blew it headlines with Harris remains in trouble ones. I was about to click on an NYT headline that read "If Harris Doesn't Change Course Now, She Could Lose The Election" until I read who the author was, some wank named Jedediah Purdy, and that told me everything I need to know.

Expand full comment
Jim Duffy's avatar

I don’t see it!

Expand full comment
M. D. Bryant's avatar

This certainly didn’t age well. It’s an embarrassment only two months later.

Expand full comment
John Powell's avatar

This aged well

Expand full comment
Barry J Kaufman DO's avatar

By being a true blue George W Bush Republican…or worse. https://barryjkaufmando.substack.com/p/dick-cheneys-kind-of-democrat

Expand full comment
Jeff's avatar

Why is Jonah Goldberg, nepo baby son of Lucianne Goldberg, the woman who gave us Linda Tripp, offered any respect at all? 🤔😉😊

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

Very good analysis.

Expand full comment