You guys go on and on about how bad is the right wing press and independent media. I agree that the right wing press is ridiculous and full of hypocrisy, but you guys are just as bad. Here are a couple examples of your bias towards the Washington establishment:
1) In your critique of Tucker Carlson, you claim that the corporate media and Democratic establishment is covering the danger of nuclear war. In reality, there is very little in the mainstream corporate press about the danger and/or consequences of nuclear war, considering the devastating possibilities. There is much more danger to the survival of humanity from nuclear war than from Jan 6. If the danger and consequences of such a war was given 1/2 the attention as Jan 6, the american public might understand the danger that the Washington establishment is putting us in and might come to their collective senses and oppose the nuclear brinkmanship that both parties are pushing.
2) You misrepresent Glenn Greenwald's positions to advance your narrative. You claim that Greenwald is being hypocritical by blaming the main stream media for inciting the threat to Justice Kavanaugh while giving Tucker Carlson and Fox news a pass. That is a blatant misrepresentation of his position. His position is thus: He does not blame any media figures for the actions of deranged criminals. He says that it is hypocritical for the Washington establishment leaning media to not hold the left to the same standards that they frequently hold the right. You may disagree with him or not but you guys just sound like total partisan hacks by misrepresenting his views. I see such blatant disregard for truth and consistency all over your content.
(3) The idea that Democrats should work with or cozy up to Liz Cheney in any capacity, as if the ideology that she believes is any use to the US, is really as much as an affront to democracy as Trump. Where is the outrage about her father's role in the shutting down of recounts in Florida (not just because he is her father, but because she represents a continuation of his policies)?
You guys go on and on about how bad is the right wing press and independent media. I agree that the right wing press is ridiculous and full of hypocrisy, but you guys are just as bad. Here are a couple examples of your bias towards the Washington establishment:
1) In your critique of Tucker Carlson, you claim that the corporate media and Democratic establishment is covering the danger of nuclear war. In reality, there is very little in the mainstream corporate press about the danger and/or consequences of nuclear war, considering the devastating possibilities. There is much more danger to the survival of humanity from nuclear war than from Jan 6. If the danger and consequences of such a war was given 1/2 the attention as Jan 6, the american public might understand the danger that the Washington establishment is putting us in and might come to their collective senses and oppose the nuclear brinkmanship that both parties are pushing.
2) You misrepresent Glenn Greenwald's positions to advance your narrative. You claim that Greenwald is being hypocritical by blaming the main stream media for inciting the threat to Justice Kavanaugh while giving Tucker Carlson and Fox news a pass. That is a blatant misrepresentation of his position. His position is thus: He does not blame any media figures for the actions of deranged criminals. He says that it is hypocritical for the Washington establishment leaning media to not hold the left to the same standards that they frequently hold the right. You may disagree with him or not but you guys just sound like total partisan hacks by misrepresenting his views. I see such blatant disregard for truth and consistency all over your content.
(3) The idea that Democrats should work with or cozy up to Liz Cheney in any capacity, as if the ideology that she believes is any use to the US, is really as much as an affront to democracy as Trump. Where is the outrage about her father's role in the shutting down of recounts in Florida (not just because he is her father, but because she represents a continuation of his policies)?