Emoluments are a prime cause for impeachment, but people don't understand what an "emolument" is--perhaps an ingredient in shampoo? We should refer to them as bribes or payoffs.
In the same vein: Did you notice that a company that donated bigly to DT's campaign is set to buy the Chinese company that operates the Panama Canal? Any connection there? Quid pro Quo? Payola? Bribe?
Only one glitch in this scenario: it appears you are assuming our Mental Midget is smart. He’s not. Per Timothy O’Brien of Bloomberg, he can’t even do basic math. O’Brien’s words: "Trump has no concept of anything other than a putter, a cheeseburger, a porn video, and somebody else's credit card."
Yes, and been tooting your own horn frequently the entire time. And of course, according to you, you're the smartest person in every room. I know your narcissism quite well.
You said I should've been talking about this months ago. I was talking about it YEARS ago. But since you clearly can't admit you fucked up with a snippy kneejerk comment, you resort to attacking me personally.
And by the way, I wrote a piece for Salon about the tariffs and chaos trades back in October 2018, which was 6 years and 4 months ago, asshole.
What I said was THIS ARTICLE would have been great a month ago. Perhaps you should learn to read before using the internet for communication. You are specifically the reason I am not a paid subscriber to The Banter.
Once again, you are wrong about everything. Keep digging a hole in front of your other readers though. :)
What difference would it make if the article was out a month ago or now? Oh that's right, you're just sniping from behind a cowardly anonymous handle without any substantive ideas of your own. I publish one item per week here and in case you hadn't noticed, there are other issues to cover in addition to this one, which -- to repeat -- I've been talking about for SIX YEARS on more than one website. So you're completely full of shit to accuse me of being a johnny-come-lately on this.
Except, you know, all the writers who covered this a month ago while you were busy fellating yourself.
If it helps any, I reposted this with a note telling people that you respond to mild (and intended to be constructive) criticisms with insults and cussing. You're a real professional, Bob. Keep at it.
Is there even any doubt?
Emoluments are a prime cause for impeachment, but people don't understand what an "emolument" is--perhaps an ingredient in shampoo? We should refer to them as bribes or payoffs.
In the same vein: Did you notice that a company that donated bigly to DT's campaign is set to buy the Chinese company that operates the Panama Canal? Any connection there? Quid pro Quo? Payola? Bribe?
Yah think🧐🤨😖
Of course he is
Pump and dump. A very old, unethical, and (used to be) illegal scam.
no question HE IS ALWAYS on some level, DEVIOUS
WORST FUCKING PRESIDENT EVER
Of course he is, stock manipulation is all he ever thinks about.
Of course he is. Where have you been????
100% the tariff announcements followed by calling it off is to manipulate the market
His corruption knows no bounds
As I just posted on BlueSky, this seems more and more plausible, likely even. And who'd gonna stop him?
What exactly did Martha Stewart do prison time for? Oh ! But a sitting president cannot be convicted of a crime soooo ….
Spreading AI art is Poor Character.
Only one glitch in this scenario: it appears you are assuming our Mental Midget is smart. He’s not. Per Timothy O’Brien of Bloomberg, he can’t even do basic math. O’Brien’s words: "Trump has no concept of anything other than a putter, a cheeseburger, a porn video, and somebody else's credit card."
But the people behind him aren't dumb at all.
This would have been a great article a month ago when several other people were noticing this.
If you had actually read the article, you'd know I was writing about this six years ago.
(Also, 2018 was seven years ago, not six. Did you read your article? 'Cause I did. Are you ever right about anything?)
Yes, and been tooting your own horn frequently the entire time. And of course, according to you, you're the smartest person in every room. I know your narcissism quite well.
You said I should've been talking about this months ago. I was talking about it YEARS ago. But since you clearly can't admit you fucked up with a snippy kneejerk comment, you resort to attacking me personally.
And by the way, I wrote a piece for Salon about the tariffs and chaos trades back in October 2018, which was 6 years and 4 months ago, asshole.
What I said was THIS ARTICLE would have been great a month ago. Perhaps you should learn to read before using the internet for communication. You are specifically the reason I am not a paid subscriber to The Banter.
Once again, you are wrong about everything. Keep digging a hole in front of your other readers though. :)
What difference would it make if the article was out a month ago or now? Oh that's right, you're just sniping from behind a cowardly anonymous handle without any substantive ideas of your own. I publish one item per week here and in case you hadn't noticed, there are other issues to cover in addition to this one, which -- to repeat -- I've been talking about for SIX YEARS on more than one website. So you're completely full of shit to accuse me of being a johnny-come-lately on this.
I mean Jesus, dude. The top comment on this post is essentially "duh." You are way too high on your own supply.
Except, you know, all the writers who covered this a month ago while you were busy fellating yourself.
If it helps any, I reposted this with a note telling people that you respond to mild (and intended to be constructive) criticisms with insults and cussing. You're a real professional, Bob. Keep at it.